Comments for Kevin Williams Photography http://kevwilfoto.wordpress.com Amateur Photography Blog Sat, 24 Nov 2012 00:08:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ Comment on Reprocessing by David Kingham http://kevwilfoto.wordpress.com/2012/06/24/reprocessing/#comment-151 Sat, 24 Nov 2012 00:08:38 +0000 http://kevwilfoto.com/?p=530#comment-151 The new is infinitely better. I think I want the foreground to be a bit brighter though

]]> Comment on Star Trails by David Kingham http://kevwilfoto.wordpress.com/2011/08/13/star-trails/#comment-150 Sat, 24 Nov 2012 00:07:17 +0000 http://kevwilfoto.wordpress.com/2011/08/13/star-trails/#comment-150 Third one for sure, you could try out my free presets too http://www.davidkinghamphotography.com/night-photography-lightroom-presets

]]> Comment on Final Review of Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR by Pete http://kevwilfoto.wordpress.com/2010/03/16/final-review-of-nikon-16-35mm-f4-vr/#comment-148 Mon, 01 Oct 2012 12:47:10 +0000 http://kevwilfoto.wordpress.com/2010/03/16/final-review-of-nikon-16-35mm-f4-vr/#comment-148 I have the 16-35, 14-24 and the old 20-35. The 20-35 I have is a bit of a freak in that it is an outstanding performer on the Two D800′s I use. The 14-24 is pretty good, no complaints. The 16-35 takes it to another level however and is easily the better from about f5.6 onwards where the 14-24 seems a marginally better at the large apertures. Bear in mind, I use capture nx for the initial part of my workflow and that does make a massive difference as opposed to using anything else.
Camera raw does not seem to live that well with Nikon Nef files from the D800 and can depict some lenses as less than sharp. A 16-35 Nef processed in Capture NX2 is a completely different animal to a Nef processed in Camera raw. In my experience so far, I would go as far as to say that if I were to use Photoshop Camera Raw only, I would be less than happy with a few of my lenses.

]]> Comment on Looking for the sun after the rain by kevwilfoto http://kevwilfoto.wordpress.com/2009/04/18/looking-for-the-sun-after-the-rain/#comment-147 Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:21:10 +0000 http://kevwilfoto.wordpress.com/2009/04/18/looking-for-the-sun-after-the-rain/#comment-147 No, sorry.

]]> Comment on Looking for the sun after the rain by Alessandra Quaranta http://kevwilfoto.wordpress.com/2009/04/18/looking-for-the-sun-after-the-rain/#comment-146 Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:13:36 +0000 http://kevwilfoto.wordpress.com/2009/04/18/looking-for-the-sun-after-the-rain/#comment-146 Hi Kevin,

are you the same Kevin Williams that shot the Bee Gees for their album ‘One’ in 1989?
I am looking for him for a music project for Rhino Records. If you are the one or can give me any leads please let me know. Thank you!

Best,
Alessandra

Alessandra Quaranta
Photo Editor
aQphoto@yahoo.com

]]> Comment on Tell Me Which Is Better by starlitbeauty28 http://kevwilfoto.wordpress.com/2011/08/05/tell-me-which-is-better/#comment-142 Wed, 18 Apr 2012 03:39:34 +0000 http://kevwilfoto.wordpress.com/2011/08/05/tell-me-which-is-better/#comment-142 Number 1 because it feels like the house has a foundation in the picture because the sky pops out at me a bit more and the sky gives a good feel to the picture overall.

]]> Comment on Ansel Adams on Visualization and Creative Photography by Fotograf http://kevwilfoto.wordpress.com/2011/09/03/ansel-adams-on-visualization-and-creative-photography/#comment-136 Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:27:48 +0000 http://kevwilfoto.wordpress.com/2011/09/03/ansel-adams-on-visualization-and-creative-photography/#comment-136 Very nice photos you are taking!If you ever wanna see my photos, then take a look here.Fotograf AarhusI'm from Denmark, and shoot alot everyday.

]]> Comment on Panasonic Lumix GX-1 compared to my G3 by AskB http://kevwilfoto.wordpress.com/2011/11/23/panasonic-lumix-gx-1-compared-to-my-g3/#comment-141 Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:58:28 +0000 http://kevwilfoto.wordpress.com/2011/11/23/panasonic-lumix-gx-1-compared-to-my-g3/#comment-141 Well, I for one is more interested in the GX1 than the G3. Smaler body and fixed screen does it for me. When I had the GF1 and on bright sunny days I thought I would want a viewfinder so I bought the X100, but I prefer to use the screen when taking pictures even on my X100. Only when I use my DSLR I prefer a viewfinder, but not on these smaller cameras. Never liked the articulated screens either, but I understand that some does. It's not a deal breaker for everyone, like some seems to think.

]]> Comment on Panasonic Lumix GX-1 compared to my G3 by Panasonia http://kevwilfoto.wordpress.com/2011/11/23/panasonic-lumix-gx-1-compared-to-my-g3/#comment-140 Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:55:56 +0000 http://kevwilfoto.wordpress.com/2011/11/23/panasonic-lumix-gx-1-compared-to-my-g3/#comment-140 Why on earth would anyone want to buy the GX1? The G3 is cheaper, almost the same size and weight, has a build in viewfinder, an articulating screen and it's almost as fast. There will be no difference in image quality either. I just don't get it. They should have started with the GX1 instead of the less interesting GF2 and GF3. The image quality of the GX1 is not much better then the earlier 12 megapixel models. Still very noisy at ISO400 and higher. The resolution is only marginally higher. I hope more effort will be made to build a micro 4/3 chip that gives us better high ISO noise results. It has been done with an APS-C sensor (the Sony NEX 5N and Fuji X100 are excellent), so why not try it with a micro 4/3 sensor.

]]> Comment on Panasonic Lumix GX-1 compared to my G3 by Natasha Tygart http://kevwilfoto.wordpress.com/2011/11/23/panasonic-lumix-gx-1-compared-to-my-g3/#comment-139 Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:38:23 +0000 http://kevwilfoto.wordpress.com/2011/11/23/panasonic-lumix-gx-1-compared-to-my-g3/#comment-139 Slightly faster? I think I'll go for G3 for longer battery life.

]]>